Florida Criminal Mischief Resolution
The charge can be dismissed after successful completion of a six-month program requiring 25 service hours, an anger-management course, $210 restitution and no Starbucks contact.
Incident: October 2025 | PTI reported: March 26, 2026 | Dismissal dependent on successful completion
Summary
A St. Petersburg Starbucks property-damage case ended with a diversion agreement rather than a trial or ordinary guilty plea.
Police said Tucker Kemp entered the coffee shop in October 2025 and complained to a manager about a Pride flag displayed on the wall.
After the employee explained that the display reflected company policy, Kemp allegedly threw tea on the flag, ripped it from the wall and placed it in a trash container.
The damage to the flag and wall was estimated at $210. Kemp was arrested on a misdemeanor criminal-mischief charge and released after posting $500 bond.
The publicity had an employment consequence. Kemp later acknowledged that his decisions led to both his arrest and termination from his job.
In March 2026, Kemp, acting without a lawyer, reached a pretrial-intervention agreement with prosecutors.
The agreement required 25 hours of community service, an eight-hour anger-management course, payment of $210 restitution and no contact with Starbucks.
Kemp accepted responsibility for the conduct. If he successfully completes the program, prosecutors will dismiss the charge.
PTI provides accountability while avoiding a final conviction for an eligible first-time offender. Failure to complete the terms can return the case to prosecution.
1. The Crime
The offense involved intentional damage to a flag and the wall from which it was removed.
Police did not charge Kemp for expressing an opinion about the display. The criminal allegation concerned the destruction of property after the employee declined to remove it.
2. Crime Location
The incident occurred inside a Starbucks store in St. Petersburg, Florida.
3. Date and Time of the Crime
- October 2025Kemp confronted a manager about the Pride flag and allegedly damaged it.
- October 22, 2025Police arrested Kemp for criminal mischief.
- After the arrestKemp lost his sales-management job.
- March 2026Kemp entered the pretrial-intervention program.
- July 30, 2026A verified dismissal after program completion had not been located.
4. Police Department
St. Petersburg police investigated the store incident.
Pinellas County prosecutors handled the PTI resolution.
5. Suspect Name
The defendant is Tucker Kemp.
6. Suspect Age
Kemp was 31 years old.
7. Charges
| Charge or Issue | Classification | Reported Basis | Outcome or Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Criminal mischief | Misdemeanor | Kemp admitted responsibility for damaging the flag and wall. | Referred to pretrial intervention |
8. Bond Amount
Kemp posted $500 bond after the original arrest.
9. Conviction
Kemp had not received a final criminal conviction under the reported PTI agreement.
Successful completion would result in dismissal.
10. Sentence
PTI is not a traditional sentence.
Its conditions were 25 community-service hours, an eight-hour anger-management class, $210 restitution and no contact with Starbucks.
11. Outcome
Kemp accepted responsibility and entered a conditional path to dismissal.
The employment termination remained separate from the criminal disposition.
12. Victim
Starbucks was the direct property victim.
The store manager was involved in the confrontation but was not reported physically injured.
Victim Name
The employee’s name was not publicly necessary to the case.
Victim Age
The employee’s age was not reported.
Speech Versus Property Damage
A customer may criticize a company display or choose not to patronize the business.
The First Amendment does not create a right to destroy privately owned property because of disagreement with its message.
13. Thoughts
The flag made the dispute political, but the criminal rule is refreshingly untheatrical: a customer does not acquire demolition rights by feeling offended. The PTI terms match the conduct by focusing on restitution, service and anger management. Whether the case disappears from the docket depends on Kemp doing the boring work of compliance, which is often how legal accountability actually looks.
SEO Keywords
Tucker Kemp, Starbucks Pride flag, pretrial intervention Florida, St Petersburg criminal mischief, Pride flag destruction, Starbucks restitution
Sources
Suggested Tags
Florida, St. Petersburg, Tucker Kemp, Starbucks, Pride Flag, Criminal Mischief, Pretrial Intervention, Male
This article is based on police records, court documents, statutes and published
reporting available as of July 30, 2026. An arrest or criminal charge is not proof
of guilt. Victim addresses and unnecessary personal information have been omitted.
Court records and custody information may change after publication.
